Flicker
FKR
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
FKR (Flicker) suffers from extensive data gaps across the vast majority of evaluated categories. Five of the six evaluation sections—Active Development, Community Support, Tokenomics, Market and Use Case, and Team and Governance—returned insufficient verifiable data (-1.0) due to an absence of official repositories, community channels, verifiable supply schedules, or confirmed leadership identities. Excluding these five sections leaves Security and Audit History as the sole basis for evaluation (100% redistributed weight). While CertiK Skynet confirms two completed audits, a Skynet score of 62.43 (Partial Rating B/BBB), and verified contract status without honeypot mechanisms or transaction taxes, it flags an alarming major holder concentration ratio of 99.07%. This extreme supply centralization presents substantial risk to potential holders despite the absence of recorded hacks or regulatory enforcement actions.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Flicker (FKR)
FKR (Flicker) is a token deployed on the Polygon blockchain (contract address 0x3f94618ad346f34f43e27f0cf46decbb0d396b1b). Listed on tracking platforms such as CertiK Skynet as a finance and real estate-oriented token, the project operates alongside the domain flickerfkr.com. However, verifiable documentation regarding its development repositories, operational roadmap, tokenomics distribution schedules, and formal governance structures is largely absent from public data sources.
From a technical and security perspective, FKR has undergone smart contract evaluations by CertiK, which recorded a Skynet security score of 62.43 (with ratings ranging between B and BBB). Security automated scans identified no honeypot mechanisms, no buy restrictions, and a 0% transaction tax on purchases and sales.
The project carries significant risks related to supply distribution and transparency. Security analyses highlight an extreme major holder concentration of 99.07% (excluding exchange and locked addresses), creating substantial centralization risk where a small number of wallets control the vast majority of the circulating supply. Furthermore, there is an absence of verifiable information concerning team identities, active developer repositories, and secondary market liquidity.