Unit Plasma
UXPL
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
Unit Plasma (UXPL) presents severe data gaps across most fundamental areas, with Active Development, Community Support, Market and Use Case, and Team and Governance all returning insufficient data (-1.0) due to project obscurity and pervasive cross-contamination with unrelated Plasma projects. In the scorable dimensions, Tokenomics scored 6.0/10 based on the underlying Plasma blockchain structure (10B genesis supply, structured vesting, and EIP-1559 burns, tempered by 50% insider concentration and unverified wrapper backing mechanics). Security and Audit History scored 2.5/10 as UXPL lacks any third-party security audits, external ratings, or verifiable documentation, despite having no confirmed protocol hacks or regulatory enforcement actions. Excluding the four unscored sections, the proportionally redistributed weighted average produces an overall score of 4.5.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Unit Plasma (UXPL)
Unit Plasma (UXPL) is a digital asset deployed on HyperEVM and Hyperliquid. The token functions as a wrapped representation of XPL, the native token of the Plasma blockchain. Under the Plasma network's documented architecture, the underlying XPL asset features a fixed genesis supply of 10 billion tokens distributed among ecosystem growth (40%), the development team (25%), private investors (25%), and a public sale (10%), alongside an EIP-1559-style fee burn and a disinflationary validator reward schedule.
Public documentation detailing the exact collateralization, issuance, and redemption mechanics of the UXPL wrapper layer is not publicly documented. The token trades with minimal liquidity and sparse market presence, and it has experienced a major price crash, declining over 94% from its all-time high. Additionally, verifiable records regarding the token's active software development, official web properties, governance apparatus, and core team members are entirely absent from indexed sources.
From a security evaluation standpoint, UXPL has not undergone any verified third-party smart contract audits by recognized security firms, nor does it carry external security ratings. While there are no documented instances of protocol exploits, depegs, or regulatory enforcement actions directly targeting the UXPL contract, the complete lack of independent audits, verifiable backing transparency, and identified leadership represents substantial risk.