FourCoin
FOUR
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The synthesis of FOUR (FourCoin) reveals substantial data gaps and low scores across the verifiable dimensions. Active Development, Community Support, and Team and Governance could not be evaluated (scores of -1.0) due to an absence of relevant project data and search results, necessitating proportional weight redistribution across remaining categories. Among evaluated sections, Tokenomics scored 3.0/10 due to high centralization risk, discretionary burn-for-perks utility, and an absence of transparent vesting or supply cap verification. Market and Use Case scored 2.0/10 as a micro-cap meme token with negligible liquidity, no clear product or roadmap, and a severe 98% to 99% drawdown from its all-time high. Security and Audit History scored 3.5/10 due to a low CertiK Skynet score (52.28 / CCC), the absence of a completed third-party security audit, single-market concentration, and ticker confusion across chains. No qualifying red-flag event triggered the manual cap rule, but the weighted average results in an overall score of 2.85.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About FourCoin (FOUR)
FOUR (FourCoin) is a cryptocurrency associated with an Ethereum smart contract address (0x244b797d622d4dee8b188b03546acaabd0cf91a0). Project documentation describes it with elements of a social and lifestyle token model featuring a burn-for-perks utility structure for experiences and auctions, while market evaluations characterize it as a micro-cap meme token lacking an articulated product roadmap or sustainable organic utility mechanisms.
The token has experienced severe market volatility, suffering a deep drawdown of 98% to 99% from its all-time high. Trading metrics reflect a micro-cap asset with estimated market valuations between $500,000 and $600,000 and daily trading volumes between $45,000 and $61,000, alongside limited liquidity across tracked exchanges.
Significant data gaps and structural risks affect the project. Public information regarding active development velocity, core team identity, and governance frameworks is undetermined. Security evaluations indicate the absence of a completed, named third-party audit report and note a CertiK Skynet score of 52.28 (CCC tier). Additionally, the project faces token identification risks due to ticker collision with unrelated tokens across multiple blockchains, as well as high supply concentration and centralization concerns.