Ultima
ULTIMA
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall assessment of ULTIMA is severely constrained by substantial data gaps across four of the six evaluation categories: Active Development, Community Support, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History all returned insufficient data (-1.0) due to search collisions with homonymous non-crypto entities and lack of target token data in retrieved sources. Excluding these four sections (totaling 65% of standard weight) leaves Tokenomics (20% original weight, normalized to 57.14%) and Market and Use Case (15% original weight, normalized to 42.86%). Both evaluated sections scored 2.5/10. ULTIMA exhibits extreme centralization, lack of a published or verifiable vesting schedule, and reflexive token utility focused primarily on staking rewards and internal splitting mechanisms rather than organic market demand. Additionally, market metrics are highly conflicting with reported market caps varying widely ($6.03M to $195.24M) and a heavily restricted float. The resulting weighted average score is 2.5/10.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Ultima (ULTIMA)
ULTIMA (Ultima) is a cryptocurrency token deployed on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). The project's core value proposition is focused on peer-to-peer payments and an internal reward-distribution mechanism referred to as "splitting." The token features a maximum total supply of 100,000 units and operates on a hyperdeflationary model incorporating declining rule-based emissions alongside transaction fee burns.
The utility of the ULTIMA token is primarily reflexive, centered around minting, staking rewards, and internal ecosystem incentives rather than external organic demand. Market tracking for the asset displays substantial inconsistencies, with reported market capitalizations ranging from $6.03 million to upwards of $200 million due to an illiquid and heavily restricted circulating float.
The project presents notable structural and transparency risks, including extreme token centralization, concentration risk, and the lack of a publicly verifiable vesting schedule. Furthermore, there are significant documentation gaps regarding the team, governance, active technical development, and formal smart contract security audits.