PEPPER
PEPPER
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
PEPPER is a community meme token on the Chiliz Chain launched via airdrops and farming for CHZ holders. The project suffers from significant data gaps in Market and Use Case as well as Team and Governance, primarily due to search contamination with unrelated entities sharing the name. Among the evaluable areas, Active Development scores poorly (1.0/10) due to a complete lack of public development footprint or visible repositories. Tokenomics (2.5/10) features a massive supply of ~8.888 quadrillion tokens without utility or deflationary mechanisms. Community Support (5.0/10) shows on-chain activity with over 65,000 holders and DAO voting participation. Security and Audit History (3.0/10) notes no professional smart-contract audits, a failing website security rating (Grade F), and a third-party 'High Risk' rating, though no exploits or regulatory actions have been documented. With the missing sections excluded and weights redistributed, the final weighted score is 2.7/10.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About PEPPER (PEPPER)
PEPPER (PEPPER) is a community meme token deployed on the Chiliz Chain. Designed as a third-party asset intended to reward the broader Chiliz community and CHZ holders, the project utilized a fair-launch distribution model comprising airdrops and harvesting mechanics, without a pre-mint allocation or an initial coin offering (ICO).
The token features a fixed maximum supply of approximately 8.888 quadrillion tokens, with an estimated 99% of the supply in circulation. PEPPER does not incorporate functional utility, deflationary burning mechanisms, or formal governance protocols. On-chain metrics reflect an active holder base exceeding 65,000 addresses and recorded participation in Chiliz-related decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) voting.
The project presents several structural and technical risk factors. There is a complete absence of public development repositories, changelogs, or an identified development team. Furthermore, PEPPER lacks a verified smart-contract audit from an established security firm. Third-party security aggregators have categorized the token as high risk, noting poor application security and a failing security grade for its primary website. No security exploits, regulatory penalties, or exchange delistings have been recorded.
