Liquid Agent
LIQUID
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
Liquid Agent (LIQUID) suffered from severe data gaps across five of the six evaluation categories: Active Development, Community Support, Tokenomics, Market and Use Case, and Team and Governance all returned insufficient verifiable data (-1.0). The single assessable category was Security and Audit History, which scored 2.5/10. LIQUID has no verified third-party audits or KYC verification, carries an unrenounced owner role, allows modification of its 5% buy/sell tax by privileged roles, and exhibits high top-holder concentration (~40.07%). Trading liquidity is negligible. While no confirmed exploits or regulatory actions were reported, the combination of pervasive data absence and structural contract risks makes the project unviable for investment.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Liquid Agent (LIQUID)
Liquid Agent (LIQUID) is an artificial intelligence-oriented project designed to facilitate Web3 interactions, such as trading, staking, and asset management, through natural-language commands. Founded in 2025 and based in Frankfurt, Germany, by Vandale Callender and Christopher Powell, the project issues its LIQUID token as an ERC-20 smart contract on the Ethereum blockchain.
Publicly verifiable data regarding the project's operational and structural metrics is limited. Evaluated sources indicate substantial data gaps across development activity, official social channels, governance documentation, and tokenomics schedules. Market activity for the token reflects minimal trading depth and low user transaction volume.
Security assessments from automated contract scans indicate that Liquid Agent has not undergone independent third-party code audits or team KYC verifications. The underlying Ethereum contract contains structural administrative permissions, including non-renounced ownership and the ability for privileged roles to alter the 5% buy and sell transaction taxes. Additionally, major holders control approximately 40% of the token supply. Although no security exploits, depegs, or regulatory actions are on record, these administrative capabilities and the absence of formal audits present structural centralization and code risks.