Kasper
KASPER
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation of KASPER reveals severe data gaps and exceptionally weak fundamentals across available metrics. Four out of six evaluation sections—Active Development, Tokenomics, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History—lacked sufficient verifiable data (-1.0) due to an absence of source coverage and multiple name collisions with Casper Network and unrelated entities. Among the scorable sections, Community Support scored 1.0/10 due to an apparent lack of verifiable community channels, governance participation, or active social engagement. Market and Use Case scored 2.0/10, reflecting its status as a micro-cap meme token with no functional utility, a market capitalization of approximately $192K, near-zero trading volume, and a 99.6% drawdown from its all-time high. No qualifying red-flag events or confirmed fraudulent mechanisms were affirmatively established, but the absence of verified development, security audits, or team credentials makes the asset extremely high-risk.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Kasper (KASPER)
KASPER (Kasper) is a micro-cap meme token that acts as a ghost mascot for the Kaspa blockchain ecosystem, existing on the Kasplex KRC-20 standard. The project lacks a whitepaper, formal technical roadmap, or defined functional utility, operating strictly as a speculative meme asset.
The project demonstrates significant data limitations and weak market fundamentals. KASPER has experienced a severe price crash, trading down 99.6% from its all-time high. It maintains a low market capitalization of approximately $192,000, alongside near-zero or stale trading volume. Furthermore, there is no verifiable information available regarding its founding team, governance framework, active development, security audits, or active community channels.