Hara

HART (Hara) presents a sharp dichotomy between a legitimate, operationally active agritech business and a dormant cryptocurrency asset. The project scores highly in 'Market and Use Case' (7.8) and 'Team and Governance' (6.8) due to verifiable real-world partnerships with major financial institutions (BNI, BTPN) and a credible, public leadership team executing on forestry and agriculture pilots in Indonesia. However, the crypto-specific fundamentals are failing. 'Active Development' (2.5) and 'Community Support' (1.5) reveal a 'zombie' protocol with zero code velocity, abandoned public channels, and negligible trading liquidity (<$2,000 daily). Furthermore, the 'Security and Audit History' (2.0) is critically poor, with no public smart contract audits found despite years of existence. While 'Tokenomics' (4.0) is stabilized by a fully circulating supply (no inflation risk), the lack of demand renders the token's utility largely theoretical. The asset currently functions as a legacy instrument detached from the active business enterprise.