GRDM

GRDM (Gridium AI) presents critical red flags indicative of a 'vaporware' or abandoned project, resulting in an exceptionally low overall score. The most alarming factor is the complete lack of Active Development (0/10), with no visible source code, GitHub activity, or technical updates. The project relies on high-concept buzzwords and unverifiable claims—such as the advisorship of a Nobel Laureate—while simultaneously creating potential brand confusion with an unrelated, legitimate non-crypto energy company named Gridium. Market and Use Case analysis reveals conflicting narratives, with some materials describing it as an AI platform and others as a stablecoin system, suggesting copied or incoherent marketing. Tokenomics are opaque, with a self-reported circulating supply and 60% of tokens held in reserve/team allocations without clear vesting schedules. Although a basic audit by Cyberscope exists, the security score is mediocre, and trading volume is effectively zero. With an anonymous team and no functional product in a sector dominated by established competitors like Bittensor and Fetch.ai, GRDM offers no viable investment thesis.