Ethix
ETHIX
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation of ETHIX (Ethix / EthicHub) is severely constrained by substantial data gaps across four key dimensions: Active Development (-1.0), Community Support (-1.0), Tokenomics (-1.0), and Team and Governance (-1.0). These gaps are primarily driven by severe ticker collisions in retrieved records with unrelated entities. Among the evaluable sections, Market and Use Case scored 2.5/10 due to a micro-cap valuation (~$2.1M-$2.36M), extremely low and inconsistent 24-hour trading liquidity ($1.58-$2,697), and limited adoption evidence. Security and Audit History scored 5.0/10, noting clean automated token scan parameters (0% taxes, no honeypot risk) alongside significant structural risks, including zero verifiable third-party smart contract audits, proxy contract upgradeability, and extreme holder concentration (97.87% held by major holders). No qualifying red-flag incidents (such as hacks, regulatory actions, or delistings) were established in the retrieved records. The overall score of 3.8 reflects the redistributed weighted average of the two available sections.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Ethix (ETHIX)
ETHIX is the native impact asset token of EthicHub, a platform designed around loan compensation and economic design mechanisms. The token is deployed across multiple blockchain networks, with verified smart contracts on Ethereum, Gnosis Chain, and Celo, and operates with a fixed maximum supply of 100,000,000 tokens.
From a market perspective, ETHIX functions as a micro-cap asset with constrained adoption and low daily trading liquidity, often registering 24-hour volumes ranging between nominal amounts and a few thousand dollars. While automated contract assessments indicate standard transactional parameters—including 0% buy and sell taxes and no honeypot mechanisms—the project maintains a low profile across governance platforms and public development records.
Risk assessments highlight several structural and technical factors. The token contract utilizes an upgradeable proxy architecture (EIP-1967) and exhibits substantial holder concentration, with approximately 97.87% of the supply held by major holders. Additionally, there is no verifiable third-party smart contract security audit available from recognized auditing firms, presenting potential centralization and technical risks for participants.