Staked UTY
YUTY
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
YUTY (Staked UTY) suffers from extreme data gaps across five of the six evaluation categories: Active Development, Community Support, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History were all scored -1.0 due to a lack of verifiable public documentation and cross-source silence. Per the data gap handling rules, these five sections were excluded and all weight redistributed to Tokenomics (scored 5.0/10). Tokenomics reveals that YUTY is a staked receipt token for synthetic dollar UTY on Avalanche with ~3.46 million total supply and ~5,713 holders, trading at a slight premium (~$1.08) reflecting yield accrual. However, secondary market liquidity is critically thin (~$153 trading volume) with unquantified centralization and counterparty exposure to issuer XSY. No qualifying red-flag events or confirmed fraud were affirmatively established, but the near-total absence of verifiable development, governance, and security records makes the asset high-risk.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Staked UTY (YUTY)
YUTY (Staked UTY) is a staked receipt token associated with the synthetic dollar UTY on the Avalanche C-Chain. Issued by XSY, the token represents staked positions of UTY and accrues yield over time, trading at a slight premium of approximately $1.08 relative to the underlying synthetic dollar's $1.00 peg. The token has a total supply of approximately 3.46 million held across roughly 5,713 addresses.
The project faces substantial transparency and liquidity constraints. There is an extreme lack of verifiable public documentation regarding the project's development activity, team background, governance framework, and security audit history. Furthermore, secondary-market liquidity is negligible, with documented trading volume of around $153 and no integration into lending markets. A disparity between circulating supply and fully diluted valuation suggests potential dilution risks without a publicly documented vesting schedule, alongside unquantified counterparty and centralization exposure tied to its issuer.