Yeet
YEET
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall assessment for YEET (Yeet) is constrained by significant data gaps across four of the six evaluation categories: Active Development, Community Support, Tokenomics, and Market and Use Case all returned insufficient data due to name collisions with unrelated software repositories and a lack of granular on-chain/market metrics in the retrieved sources. Among the evaluable sections, Team and Governance scored 4.0/10 due to opaque governance structures, lack of on-chain voting frameworks, and unconfirmed links to broader corporate entities. Conversely, Security and Audit History scored 7.0/10, supported by a formal third-party audit from Zellic, an Immunefi audit competition, and no reported exploits or regulatory actions. With 70% of the standard weighting excluded due to data gaps, the score is calculated exclusively from Team and Governance (50% adjusted weight) and Security and Audit History (50% adjusted weight), yielding a score of 5.5. No qualifying red-flag events were established.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Yeet (YEET)
YEET (Yeet) is a gaming and decentralized finance token operating within the Berachain ecosystem. The protocol centers on smart contract mechanics implemented in its core contract (Yeet.sol), which features a staking and "yeet pot" game structure incorporating tax-to-treasury allocations and "yeetback" reward distributions. The token is also tracked across multi-chain balances associated with its deployment address.
From a security perspective, Yeet underwent a third-party smart contract audit conducted by Zellic and hosted an Immunefi audit competition to identify potential vulnerabilities. The project has no documented history of smart contract exploits, security breaches, depegs, or regulatory enforcement actions in the available evaluation data.
Governance and transparency present key risk considerations for the project. YEET lacks documented decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) frameworks, on-chain voting mechanisms, or formalized governance procedures, resulting in an unproven or centralized governance model. Additionally, public data regarding active development, market activity, and detailed tokenomics remains limited due to widespread name collisions with unrelated software repositories and a lack of verified metric disclosures.