Yaku
YAKU
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall evaluation for YAKU is severely constrained by substantial data gaps across five of the six evaluation pillars: Active Development, Tokenomics, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History all returned insufficient data (-1.0) due to search collisions with unrelated entities and an absence of verifiable token-specific documentation. The only evaluable metric, Community Support, scored 1.5/10 based on on-chain data showing extreme centralisation (approximately 28 Ethereum holders with 100% top-holder concentration) and no detectable grassroots engagement or active governance forums. With five sections excluded and their weights redistributed, the final weighted score stands at 1.5. No affirmative red-flag events or confirmed fraudulent mechanisms were established, but the extreme data scarcity and dormant metrics indicate severe investment risk.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Yaku (YAKU)
YAKU (Yaku) is a cryptocurrency token deployed on the Solana network (contract AqEHVh8J2nXH9saV2ciZyYwPpqWFRfD2ffcq5Z8xxqm5), with bridged contract deployments on Ethereum and Arbitrum One. Available documentation provides limited verified information regarding the project's functional purpose, technical mechanisms, core team, or designated token utility, with multiple evaluation areas constrained by data gaps and search collisions with unrelated entities.
On-chain metrics for the token demonstrate minimal participation and high centralization. On Ethereum, the token exhibits an extremely thin holder base of approximately 28 holders, with 100% of the supply concentrated among major holders. There is no verifiable governance structure, active forum presence, or detectable grassroots community engagement, indicating that the project is largely dormant or inactive.
Evaluation data reveals significant information gaps across active development, market capitalization, trading volume, and tokenomics details such as total supply and vesting schedules. Furthermore, there is no public record of independent smart contract security audits, exploit histories, or formal regulatory actions, leaving the project's overall technical and security status unverified.