USSI
USSI
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
USSI (associated with the SoSoValue Index on Base) suffers from severe data gaps across almost all evaluation categories. Five of the six sections—Active Development, Community Support, Tokenomics, Market and Use Case, and Team and Governance—received scores of -1.0 due to a total lack of verifiable token-specific data in retrieved sources. The only evaluable category is Security and Audit History (6.5/10), which verified a substantive smart contract audit conducted by BlockSec. The audit identified two High and three Medium severity vulnerabilities, all of which were successfully fixed, though auditor notes regarding potential centralization risks and redemption/withdrawal timing remain unaddressed. No hacks, exploits, legal actions, or insolvency events were found. Due to the absence of data across all fundamental and operational metrics, the overall score is based entirely on the security audit result.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About USSI (USSI)
USSI is an index token associated with the SoSoValue Index protocol, deployed on the Base blockchain. The token is designed as part of the SoSoValue Index product architecture. Due to substantial data limitations across available public records, specific details regarding the token's circulating supply, total supply, tokenomics schedule, market capitalization, active development activity, and core team members remain unverified.
The protocol's smart contracts, including the USSI contract, underwent a third-party security audit conducted by BlockSec. The audit identified two high-severity issues (related to withdrawal amount validation and redeem request status checks) and three medium-severity vulnerabilities (concerning pause mechanics, potential replay attacks, and gas limits), all of which were resolved prior to finalization. No historical security exploits, smart contract hacks, depeg incidents, or regulatory enforcement actions were identified in relation to the protocol.
Auditors noted residual operational risks within the codebase, specifically highlighting potential centralization risk due to administrative control parameters, as well as operational concerns that withdrawals or redemptions may not always execute within anticipated timeframes.