USDa
USDA
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation of USDA (USDa) is severely constrained by pervasive data gaps across five of the six evaluation dimensions: Active Development, Community Support, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History all returned insufficient data (-1.0) due to search query collisions with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Only Tokenomics provided sufficient data for scoring (5.5/10), noting multi-chain utility tied to Angle Protocol alongside significant centralization risks (contract-level mint/burn/pause/blacklist capabilities), a slim surplus buffer ($543,200), and unverified reserve attestations. Redistributing the entire scoring weight to the sole evaluable section yields an overall score of 5.5. No affirmative qualifying red-flag events or fraudulent mechanics were established.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About USDa (USDA)
USDA (USDa) is a multi-chain stablecoin associated with the Angle Protocol and Avalon Labs. Designed to function across multiple blockchain networks—including Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Mantle—the token utilizes an elastic supply model with utility deployed across 13 chains.
The token's architecture incorporates smart contract controls with administrative capabilities. According to protocol evaluations, USDa maintains a surplus buffer of approximately $543,200 relative to its circulating supply, though there are conflicting claims regarding the nature and composition of its backing reserves.
Risk assessments highlight notable structural and transparency concerns. The token's smart contracts grant privileged permissions that allow administrators to mint, burn, pause transfers, and blacklist specific addresses. Additionally, verifiable third-party smart contract audits and regular reserve attestations were absent from evaluation records, accompanied by substantial data gaps regarding active development tracking and governance participation.