Tutorial
TUT
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall assessment of TUT (Tutorial) is severely limited due to significant data retrieval gaps across four of the six evaluation categories. Active Development, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History all received scores of -1.0 (Insufficient Data) because external searches failed to return token-specific records. The overall score is calculated exclusively from the remaining sections: Community Support (3.5/10) and Tokenomics (3.0/10). TUT operates as a meme-classified token on the BNB Chain / Four.Meme ecosystem with an AI-education theme, but its engagement relies on incentive programs rather than organic community adoption. Furthermore, while the majority of its 1 billion supply is circulating, there is a total lack of documented vesting, emission, or burn mechanics, combined with thin liquidity (9.36% liquidity-to-market-cap ratio) and purely speculative trading utility.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Tutorial (TUT)
Tutorial (TUT) is a cryptocurrency token deployed on the BNB Chain that is themed around an artificial intelligence-powered decentralized education concept. Associated with the Four.Meme ecosystem, the project has conducted creator incentive campaigns and educational-themed initiatives, though the token is primarily categorized as a meme token with use cases centered around speculative trading.
The token features a maximum supply of 1 billion TUT, with the majority of the supply reported as circulating. However, the project lacks documented tokenomic structures, with no formal schedules or specifications available regarding token vesting, emissions, or token-burning mechanisms. Governance mechanisms are similarly undocumented, with no verifiable decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) proposals or structured community voting frameworks on record.
TUT presents several operational and market risks, notably thin market depth characterized by a liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of 9.36% alongside high trading volume turnover. Furthermore, public data regarding the core team, active software development, and formal third-party security audits remains unavailable, and community participation has been sustained largely through incentive programs rather than organic governance engagement.