Tsuki
TSUKI
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall assessment of TSUKI reveals extreme structural risks and massive data gaps across almost all dimensions. Four of the six evaluation sections—Community Support, Tokenomics, Market and Use Case, and Team and Governance—received scores of -1.0 due to insufficient data, as identity verification failed across sources due to severe name collisions and a lack of verifiable presence for the Solana token. Among the scorable sections, Active Development received a 1.0/10 due to the complete absence of a verifiable public codebase or roadmap progress, and Security and Audit History received a 2.0/10 reflecting zero smart contract audits, no verifiable team accountability, and unknown contract provenance (though no affirmative exploits or legal actions were identified). Excluding the four unscoreable sections and proportionally reweighting Active Development (57.14%) and Security (42.86%) results in a weighted score of 1.4/10. Given the lack of verified development, missing governance and tokenomics data, and severe unverified identity risks, TSUKI presents an unacceptable risk profile.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Tsuki (TSUKI)
TSUKI (Tsuki) is a cryptocurrency token deployed on the Solana blockchain (contract address: 463SK47VkB7uE7XenTHKiVcMtxRsfNE2X4Q9wByaURVA). Publicly verifiable documentation regarding the project's core purpose, underlying utility, and architectural mechanisms is largely absent, with no verified official website or canonical project page associated with the contract address.
The project is characterized by extensive data gaps across major operational areas. Key fundamentals—including total token supply, distribution mechanics, vesting schedules, market metrics, and governance structures—remain unverified. Additionally, there is a complete absence of verifiable development activity, public code repositories, or roadmap execution, pointing to a stalled project posture.
From a security standpoint, TSUKI has no record of smart contract audits by recognized third-party security firms. While no hacks, exploits, regulatory enforcement actions, or exchange delistings have been formally documented, the token carries high structural risk due to unaudited code of unknown provenance and a lack of verifiable team accountability. The project also faces severe name collisions with unrelated entities and software products, creating substantial identity verification challenges.