TOMI

TOMI aims to be a Web3 “super app” (chat-native payments, wallet, browser, creator tools) and shows some product activity via recent mobile/browser releases, but engineering transparency is weak with no public repos or observable CI/issue hygiene. The token’s security posture is poor: the contract is upgradeable with admin/upgrade privileges, there’s no publicly submitted audit, and third-party scanners flag risks—leaving significant backdoor/centralization exposure. Governance and team trustworthiness are concerning (founder concentration, reported legal controversies, and community complaints about dilution/supply changes), undermining the project’s DAO narrative. Market-wise, TOMI faces intense competition from established messenger+wallet and DeSoc ecosystems, with limited evidence of differentiation or traction. Combined with severe drawdowns and credibility issues, the risk/reward profile is unattractive at this stage. Until the team publishes reputable audits, hardens governance (multisig+timelock/renounced controls), and clarifies immutable tokenomics with transparent reporting, this remains a high-risk speculation.