sUSX
SUSX
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
SUSX (sUSX), identified as the staking/savings receipt token for the dForce USX ecosystem, suffers from severe data deficiencies across most evaluation areas. Four of the six categories—Community Support, Tokenomics, Market and Use Case, and Team and Governance—lacked sufficient project-specific data to score, resulting in -1.0 ratings. Among the scorable sections, Active Development received a 2.5/10 due to an absence of measurable development velocity, releases, or roadmap progress, suggesting the protocol is in maintenance-only mode or stalled. On the security front (5.5/10), sUSX has a verified smart contract audit conducted by MixBytes, and no exploits, depegs, insolvencies, or regulatory actions were identified in the available records. With weights redistributed across the available sections, the synthesized score is 3.8/10.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About sUSX (SUSX)
sUSX (SUSX) is a staking and savings receipt token associated with the dForce protocol's USX stablecoin ecosystem. The asset functions as a receipt token for users participating in savings or staking mechanisms related to USX within the dForce platform.
The smart contract codebase for sUSX was audited by the blockchain security firm MixBytes, which performed verification of the protocol's contracts. Evaluation records indicate no documented security exploits, smart contract compromises, or depeg incidents specific to the sUSX token.
A primary operational concern is the absence of measurable development momentum and transparency. Evaluation data notes a lack of recent development velocity, software releases, active governance, or roadmap milestones, indicating the project is in maintenance-only mode or stalled. Additionally, verifiable information regarding its community channels, detailed tokenomics, and team governance structure remains severely limited.