Starpower
STAR
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
STAR (Starpower) demonstrates critical structural and operational weaknesses across all evaluated domains. Active development is effectively stalled with no verifiable public repositories, commit activity, or code audits. Community support is negligible with an absence of organic governance or social engagement, paired with zero 24-hour on-chain transaction activity. Tokenomics are highly concerning due to major unreconciled supply discrepancies between project documentation (1 billion), on-chain BSC records (~98.14 million with an active minter), and exchange trackers (~186M circulating / ~553M total), alongside a 70% opaque builder allocation and high concentration. Team and governance structures are unverifiable, while security analysis highlights an unaddressed mint-authority risk, absence of public verified audits, and signs consistent with an abandoned deployment. Although no discrete hacks or legal proceedings were documented, the lack of transparency, active mint authority, and non-existent technical infrastructure represent extreme risk.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Starpower (STAR)
Starpower (STAR) is a decentralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN) project in the energy sector, deployed across the BNB Smart Chain and Solana blockchains. The project is designed around distributed energy resource (DER) management and hardware integration. Despite marketing announcements regarding hardware and exchange listings, there is an absence of verifiable engineering outputs, public code repositories, or evidence of real-world infrastructure adoption and network usage.
The project exhibits substantial tokenomics ambiguities and supply discrepancies across different platforms. Documentation specifies a total supply of 1 billion tokens with an opaque 70% builder allocation and high concentration among top holders (38.41%). In contrast, BNB Smart Chain on-chain records reflect a maximum supply of approximately 98.14 million tokens controlled by an active minter address, while third-party market trackers report around 186 million circulating tokens out of a total supply of roughly 553 million.
Starpower displays indicators consistent with an inactive or abandoned deployment. The token experienced a price drawdown of over 68% from its peak. Furthermore, on-chain evaluation indicates zero 24-hour transaction activity, structurally absent governance processes, a lack of active social engagement, and no verified third-party security audits. The combination of unmonitored deployment, missing code repositories, and an active minting authority presents significant structural risks.