8 Ball
SN125
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
SN125 (8 Ball) is a Bittensor subnet token facing severe information gaps across several core dimensions. Four of the six evaluated areas—Active Development, Community Support, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History—scored -1.0 due to a lack of token-specific retrieved data and search collisions. Among the evaluable sections, Tokenomics scored 4.5/10 due to a known dynamic burn mechanism (~29%) and linear vesting, offset by unverified allocation details, utility, and supply metrics. Market and Use Case scored 2.5/10, reflecting thin liquidity, an unverified use case, and a substantial supply overhang with a market capitalization of ~$2.59M against an FDV of ~$13.02M. Redistributing weights across the two evaluable sections yields an overall score of 3.6.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About 8 Ball (SN125)
SN125 (8 Ball) is a token associated with Subnet 125 within the Bittensor ecosystem. The token operates on the Bittensor network and incorporates specific tokenomic features, including a dynamic burn mechanism that has burned approximately 29% of tokens, as well as linear vesting schedules designed for liquidity pool allocations.
From a market perspective, SN125 exhibits a market capitalization of approximately $2.59 million compared to a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of roughly $13.02 million. This creates a supply overhang of roughly 5x between its circulating valuation and its fully diluted supply. The token also experiences thin trading liquidity and inconsistent price reporting across tracking platforms.
The project faces notable information and transparency constraints. Publicly available disclosures lack verifiable documentation detailing the subnet's core use case, underlying utility, and value proposition. Furthermore, there is insufficient verifiable data regarding the project's development activity, core team, governance mechanisms, community channels, and independent security audits.