Singularry

The evaluation for Singularry presents a critical level of risk due to severe inconsistencies and identity confusion within the provided due diligence data. The assessment data conflates two distinct and contradictory profiles (referenced as 'Pleasing Gold' and 'COCA'), resulting in a polarized and unreliable score profile. While sections regarding market utility and security concepts score moderately well (up to 7.5/10) citing functional wallet products and partnerships, the foundational metrics are failing. Active Development (1.5/10) and Tokenomics (1.5/10) indicate a closed-source ecosystem, a lack of developer activity, and opaque governance. Furthermore, the 'Community Support' and 'Team' sections highlight major red flags, including a lack of public audits, anonymous founders, and potential scam indicators associated with the 'Pleasing Gold' references. Due to the inability to verify the project's true nature amidst this conflicting data and the presence of 'Very Poor' transparency scores, the token is uninvestable.