Rank
RAN
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The synthesis for RAN (Rank) reflects severe data gaps across nearly all analytical dimensions due to search collisions with telecommunications terms (Radio Access Network) and traditional corporate entities (Rank Group Plc). Five of the six sections—Active Development, Community Support, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History—scored -1.0 due to a total lack of token-specific data and verification. The sole scorable section is Tokenomics (3.0/10), which highlights significant risk: a low circulating supply of 186.6 million against a 1 billion max supply (81.3% non-circulating supply overhang), 25% allocated to team and investors, and an absence of documented vesting schedules, burn mechanics, or verified utility. With 100% of the active weight placed on Tokenomics, the calculated overall score is 3.0.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Rank (RAN)
Rank (RAN) is a cryptographic token deployed on the BNB Chain. According to available token distribution figures, RAN has a total and maximum supply of 1 billion tokens, with a circulating supply of approximately 186.6 million tokens. The initial token allocation designates 35.85% for rewards, 21.65% for the ecosystem, 17.5% for presale participants, 15% for the core team, and 10% for private investors.
Public documentation and verifiable information regarding the token's technical infrastructure, underlying use cases, active development, and governance structure remain limited. Details concerning vesting timelines for team and investor allocations, as well as formal smart contract audit reports and verifiable communication channels, are not documented in public records.
The project faces notable transparency risks and structural supply overhang, as approximately 81.3% of the total token supply remains non-circulating. Additionally, the lack of verifiable technical roadmaps, published team identities, or established audit histories creates substantial informational gaps regarding the token's long-term utility and operational status.