ORANGE
ORNG
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation for ORNG is characterized by extensive data gaps across five of the six evaluated dimensions (Active Development, Community Support, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History), where search results retrieved information for unrelated corporate entities (e.g., Orange S.A., OrangeHRM) rather than the token on Avalanche. Only Tokenomics provided sufficient token-specific data, receiving a score of 2.5/10 due to thin utility (governance and speculation only), zero visibility into circulating/maximum supply, missing emission schedules, and unassessed concentration risks. Following data gap rules, the remaining 100% weight is allocated to Tokenomics, yielding an overall score of 2.5. No qualifying red-flag events or deliberate fraud were established from the retrieved evidence.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About ORANGE (ORNG)
ORANGE (ORNG) is the governance and value-accrual token for Orange Web3, deployed on the Avalanche blockchain. The project utilizes a dual-token structure in which ORNG functions as the primary governance token, while a companion token, JUC, is designated for network gas and transaction processing. Self-reported metrics from the project include over 38 million testnet transactions and more than 19,000 active wallets.
The utility of the ORNG token is limited to governance and speculation, with no documented mechanisms for staking yields, fee burns, or tiered access. The project exhibits significant tokenomic opacity, as critical supply metrics—including total supply, maximum supply, circulating supply, allocation breakdowns, and vesting schedules—are not publicly disclosed or verifiable in available documentation.
Evaluation of the ORNG project is constrained by extensive data gaps across multiple operational areas. There is insufficient verifiable information regarding active development repositories, roadmaps, team identity, and community engagement metrics. Furthermore, no verified third-party smart contract audits, security scores, or formal trading histories are documented for the contract address on Avalanche.