Orgo
ORGO
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
ORGO (Orgo) is a Solana-based token associated with AI-agent infrastructure. The project suffers from significant data gaps: both the Market and Use Case and Team and Governance sections scored -1.0 due to identity verification failures and ticker collisions with unrelated entities, necessitating their exclusion from the weighted average. Among the scorable sections, Active Development received a 4.0/10 based on pre-1.0 Python SDK activity on PyPI (orgo.ai), though linkage to the on-chain token remains unverified and exhibits high bus-factor risk. Community Support scored 1.0/10 due to an absence of formal governance, DAOs, or documented social engagement beyond basic Arkham chat activity. Tokenomics scored 4.5/10, showing standard 4-year vesting for team allocations but lacking documented fee-accrual or deflationary burn mechanics. Security and Audit History scored 4.5/10 based on an automated HashEx AI audit (score 55/100) confirming revoked mint authority and non-freezable status, tempered by updatable metadata flags and holder concentration. No qualifying red-flag events were established.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Orgo (ORGO)
ORGO (Orgo) is a utility and governance token deployed on the Solana blockchain. The token is associated with Orgo (orgo.ai), a platform designed to provide infrastructure and software development kits (SDKs) for artificial intelligence agents. The project's token architecture is built on the standard Solana SPL framework with a total supply of approximately one billion tokens.
The project's tokenomics include a four-year vesting schedule featuring a one-year cliff for team and early allocations. Staking rewards are distributed through protocol emissions rather than structural revenue-sharing or deflationary token-burning mechanisms. External development activity associated with the project includes iterative pre-1.0 releases of a Python SDK on PyPI, though direct documentation linking repository commits directly to on-chain token operations is limited, reflecting a single-maintainer structure.
Security and governance evaluations indicate several operational and structural risks. An automated security analysis conducted by HashEx assigned the token contract a score of 55 out of 100; the evaluation confirmed that mint authority has been revoked and tokens cannot be frozen, but flagged mutable metadata and token distribution concentration. Furthermore, the project lacks formal decentralized governance structures, verified DAO tooling, and public third-party manual audits.