Orbitt Token
ORBT
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
ORBT (Orbitt Token) displays severe fundamental and market weaknesses across all evaluated dimensions. Data gaps exist in Active Development and Community Support, where insufficient reliable data and search contamination prevented scoring (-1.0), requiring their weights to be redistributed across remaining sections. In Tokenomics (4.0/10), the project features conflicting circulating supply and vesting data alongside steep token price depreciation. Market and Use Case (1.0/10) reflects near-total market obsolescence, characterized by a micro-cap valuation under $50K, negligible daily volume, and a 99.6% decline from all-time highs. Team and Governance (2.0/10) suffers from a completely pseudonymous team with unverified credentials and an absence of formal governance frameworks. In Security and Audit History (4.0/10), Orbitt engaged CertiK, but the audit remains incomplete with open remediation items and no verified KYC; no direct protocol hacks or exploits were identified on the Solana deployment. Based on the weighted average of available metrics, the project presents substantial downside risks with minimal evidence of organic adoption or operational traction.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
