Energi
NRG
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation of NRG (Energi) is severely constrained by widespread data gaps resulting from a ticker collision with the NYSE-listed utility NRG Energy, Inc. Consequently, five of the six evaluation sections (Active Development, Tokenomics, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History) received scores of -1.0 due to insufficient crypto-specific data. The only scorable category is Community Support (Score: 2.0/10), which shows minimal on-chain engagement with roughly 1,950 ERC-20 holders, an on-chain market cap under $100k, and a complete absence of dated governance proposals or active discussions over the past 12-18 months. With the other categories excluded and weight redistributed entirely to Community Support, the overall score is 2.0.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Energi (NRG)
Energi (NRG) is a cryptocurrency associated with a dedicated native blockchain network as well as an ERC-20 token contract deployed on the Ethereum blockchain. The token shares its ticker symbol with the unrelated US-listed utility company NRG Energy, Inc., which frequently leads to data disambiguation challenges in financial and market tracking services.
On-chain data for the project's ERC-20 token indicates a limited distribution, with approximately 1,950 token holders and an on-chain market capitalization of roughly $95,500 recorded at a price point of approximately $0.0086 per token as of August 2026. While a native chain explorer indicates the underlying network infrastructure remains accessible, comprehensive details regarding native tokenomics, circulating supply structures, and core utility mechanisms are largely undocumented in evaluated datasets.
The project displays low levels of public engagement and community participation. Evaluation of governance systems reveals a lack of dated DAO proposals, forum activity, and active discussions over a 12-to-18-month evaluation window. Furthermore, public documentation regarding active developer contributions, team leadership, and third-party security audit histories remains heavily constrained.