NERO Chain

NERO Chain presents a critical dichotomy between its high-quality organizational structure and a near-total absence of technical execution. The project scores highly on Team and Governance (8.5/10), backed by credible leadership with institutional backgrounds, and offers a compelling Market and Use Case (7.2/10) through its 'Blockspace 2.0' fee-sharing model and gas abstraction features. However, these conceptual strengths are severely undermined by the Active Development score (0.5/10); the project displays characteristics of vaporware, with an effectively empty mainnet repository and reliance on forks, contradicting its claims of being an advanced Layer 1. While Tokenomics (6.8/10) are innovative regarding developer incentives, they carry significant dilution risks due to high locked supply. Community Support (6/10) is broad but seemingly hollow, driven largely by incentives rather than organic engagement. Consequently, NERO currently appears to be a marketing-forward project with 'paper' legitimacy but no proven engineering delivery, presenting extreme risk despite the strong credentials of its founders.