Lucidum
LUCIC
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
Lucidum (LUCIC) suffers from severe data gaps across five of the six evaluation categories: Active Development, Community Support, Tokenomics, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History all received scores of -1.0 due to a total lack of verifiable project-specific data and widespread name collisions with unrelated commercial entities. Market and Use Case was the sole scorable dimension (2.5/10), reflecting extremely thin liquidity relative to its reported market cap, fragmented order books, and lack of verifiable real-world utility. With all other sections excluded from the weighted average, the final score of 2.5 is derived entirely from the Market and Use Case evaluation.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Lucidum (LUCIC)
Lucidum (LUCIC) is a cryptocurrency token deployed on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC) under the contract address 0xe054017a2f0ecfa294b08a74af319bce0b985a39. Public tracking data and market aggregators offer minimal verifiable information regarding the project's foundational architecture, development activity, intended utility, or technical mechanisms.
The market profile of LUCIC is characterized by low liquidity relative to its reported market capitalization, which ranges between $17.5 million and $24 million across various data sources. Daily trading volumes remain minimal, ranging from single-digit figures to approximately $113,000, creating fragmented order books and high slippage risks for market participants attempting to execute trades.
Evaluation of the project reveals significant transparency and data gaps. There is no verified record of smart contract audits, identifiable development repositories, or documented governance structures for the token. Additionally, no official team disclosures, operational roadmaps, or tokenomics breakdowns are publicly verified, representing considerable informational risks.