Liora
LIORA
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall evaluation for LIORA reveals an extremely weak asset characterized by severe data gaps and minimal market traction. Three sections—Community Support, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History—received scores of -1.0 due to a total lack of verifiable data and name collisions with unrelated projects. Among the evaluable criteria, Active Development scored 1.0/10 due to the complete absence of official public repositories, tagged releases, or roadmaps for the Tron contract. Tokenomics scored 2.0/10, exhibiting severe insider centralization (65.5% held across team and treasury), questionable utility, and documentation anomalies. Market and Use Case scored 1.5/10 due to negligible liquidity (~$331 daily volume), a tiny market cap of ~$12.27K, and no clear value proposition. Reallocating weights proportionally across the three evaluable sections produces a final score of 1.5.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Liora (LIORA)
LIORA (Liora) is a cryptocurrency token deployed on the Tron blockchain. With a total and maximum supply fixed at 1,000,000,000 tokens, LIORA was introduced with verified utility restricted primarily to basic peer-to-peer transactions and tipping. The project lacks complex native protocol mechanics or deflationary supply features.
The project's tokenomics reflect substantial supply concentration, with approximately 65.5% of the total supply allocated across development, team, and treasury reserves. In the secondary market, LIORA operates as a micro-cap asset characterized by minimal trading activity and low liquidity, with a market capitalization of approximately $12,270 and 24-hour trading volumes frequently below $400.
Evaluation of the project highlights significant transparency and operational risks. There is an absence of verifiable public code repositories, changelogs, roadmaps, or published smart contract audits for the Tron contract. Additionally, the project exhibits significant documentation anomalies, including a whitepaper titled under an unrelated token name and inconsistencies in vesting data. Broad data voids surrounding the founding team, governance structure, and community channels further limit independent verification of the project's development.