LIKE

The evaluation of LIKE reveals a complex investment profile characterized by a dichotomy between strong human capital and weak technical/market indicators, further complicated by a split identity between the Cosmos-based LikeCoin and the Solana-based Only1 project in the provided data. On the positive side, the project excels in Team and Governance (8.5/10) and Community Support (7.2/10), driven by the LikeCoin ecosystem's credible leadership (e.g., Kin Ko) and a highly authentic, grassroots user base focused on decentralized publishing. Tokenomics (6.8/10) are functional, providing clear utility for governance and content registration, though inflationary pressures from the 'Proof of Creativity' model persist. Conversely, the project suffers significantly in Market presence (4.5/10) and Active Development (4.5/10), showing signs of a mature project in maintenance mode with low code velocity and limited market capture in the competitive SocialFi sector. The most critical failing is in Security and Audit History (2/10), where a lack of verified public audits for the relevant contracts presents a severe risk. The overall score of 5.59 reflects a project with a solid ethos and governance foundation but insufficient growth momentum and security assurance to warrant a higher confidence rating.