KLEVA
KLEVA
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
KLEVA (KLEVA) is the governance and utility token of the Klaytn-based KLEVA Protocol. The project demonstrates severe fundamental weaknesses across available evaluation metrics, alongside significant data gaps in Community Support and Team and Governance (both scored -1.0 due to an absence of verifiable social/governance metrics and search contamination). On active development, documentation was updated with a 2025-2026 roadmap pivot, but verifiable on-chain or code execution evidence is absent (score 3.5). Tokenomics are poorly documented with missing supply statistics and generic utility claims (score 2.0). Market adoption is negligible, marked by a market cap of roughly $733k and near-zero 24-hour volume ($0-$78), indicating a functionally dormant state (score 1.5). Security review shows one legacy audit by SCVSoft with resolved informative findings and no reported exploits, though ongoing security coverage is lacking (score 5.0). The overall score is calculated from the remaining four sections with weights redistributed proportionally.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About KLEVA (KLEVA)
KLEVA is the utility and governance token of the KLEVA Protocol, a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform focused on leveraged yield and farming built on the Klaytn blockchain. The token was designed to provide access to protocol features and associated benefits within its network.
Official documentation for the protocol outlines a 2025–2026 roadmap reflecting a strategic pivot toward new initiatives, including an InfoFi platform named Tikkly and an AI Agent Reward App. While documentation updates have occurred, there is an absence of independent, verifiable evidence regarding code releases, governance actions, or milestone deployment for these planned products.
The project faces notable transparency and liquidity challenges. KLEVA exhibits minimal market activity with thin liquidity and negligible 24-hour trading volume. Furthermore, official public resources omit basic tokenomics data, such as detailed supply metrics, vesting schedules, and emission mechanisms. On the security front, the protocol's legacy smart contracts were audited by SCVSoft, which identified only minor informative issues that were subsequently resolved; however, the project lacks continuous audit coverage or an active bug bounty program.