K21
K21
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation of K21 is constrained by substantial data gaps across four of the six evaluation sections: Tokenomics, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History all scored -1.0 due to a lack of token-specific documentation, audit records, or search collisions with unrelated entities. Among the evaluable sections, K21 exhibits an essentially stalled posture with no active public engineering footprint or governance proposals (Active Development: 0.5/10). Its community remains static and low-activity despite retaining roughly 3,670 on-chain holders and a small market capitalization of ~$312k (Community Support: 1.5/10). No affirmative red-flag security events or confirmed fraud were identified, but the lack of verifiable development, transparent governance, and security audits presents extreme uncertainty.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About K21 (K21)
K21 (K21) is an ERC-20 token deployed on the Ethereum blockchain. The project maintains an on-chain presence, though public documentation detailing its original use case, architectural mechanisms, underlying team, and tokenomic structure is sparse across available sources.
On-chain data indicates that K21 maintains a static holder base of approximately 3,670 to 3,676 addresses, with a market capitalization of roughly $312,000 as of August 2026. While the token contract remains deployed and active on Ethereum, community engagement and participation in decentralized governance remain minimal, with no active governance forum discussions or decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) proposals recorded.
Evaluation of the project reveals a stalled development posture, showing an absence of public engineering activity, code commits, or regular operational updates. Additionally, there are no verifiable third-party security audits or transparent team disclosures associated with the contract. While no security breaches, regulatory actions, or insolvency events have been documented for the token, the lack of ongoing technical development and transparent governance represents an area of uncertainty.