JACK
JACK
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
Whale Pulse
Large transaction flow (>$10k)
No whale transactions >$10k detected recently for JACK.
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation of JACK reveals a project with a severe dichotomy between its technical foundations and its operational viability. The analysis primarily identifies the token as 'Stable Jack' (DeFi on Avalanche), which boasts a 'Great' security score (8.5/10) with verified audits and no exploit history, alongside a sound theoretical use case (Score 7/10) offering liquidation-free leverage and yield trading. The tokenomics (Score 6.2/10) are also structured reasonably well with a fixed supply and high circulation. However, these static strengths are overshadowed by signs of total project abandonment. Active Development is virtually non-existent (Score 1.5/10), with repositories showing no activity since late 2024, earning it a 'zombie' status. Community Support is at rock bottom (Score 1/10) with negligible engagement, and the Team and Governance score (2.5/10) is heavily penalized due to a lack of transparency, confusion with the unrelated 'FortuneJack' casino entity, and failure to deliver on DAO promises. While the code is secure and the concept valid, the lack of developers and community makes this a dormant asset.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
