IMO
IMO
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation of IMO is severely impacted by substantial data gaps resulting from name collisions and search capturing by homonymous non-crypto entities, including the International Maritime Organization (a UN agency) and Imperial Oil Limited. As a consequence, five out of six analytical sections (Active Development, Community Support, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History) recorded insufficient data (-1.0) and were excluded from scoring. The sole evaluable section, Tokenomics (score: 3.0), outlines a revenue-sharing utility model via ERC-7641 tokens capturing onchain AI model and AIGC-NFT fees; however, critical metrics such as circulating supply, vesting schedules, emissions, and FDV remain entirely unverified. With 100% of the redistributed weight assigned to Tokenomics, the overall score is 3.0. Due to pervasive identity verification failures and missing fundamental data, the asset poses an elevated risk profile.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About IMO (IMO)
IMO (IMO) is a cryptocurrency asset operating across the Base and Solana blockchains. The project is designed around an ERC-7641 revenue-sharing token standard, intended to distribute a share of protocol profits from onchain artificial intelligence (AI) model revenue and AI-generated content (AIGC) non-fungible token (NFT) fees to token holders.
Onchain data on the Base network indicates a holder base of over 71,000 addresses and an estimated market capitalization of approximately $7.13 million at a trading price of roughly $0.41. However, detailed technical and operational information regarding its deployment and cross-chain architecture across Solana remains limited in public records.
The project presents significant transparency risks due to substantial gaps in verifiable data. Public documentation regarding the core development team, governance mechanisms, and active repository development is largely absent. Furthermore, essential quantitative tokenomics metrics—including total supply, circulating supply, fully diluted valuation, token emission schedules, and vesting terms—have not been verified, and no third-party smart contract security audits have been documented for the token contracts.