ICB Network
ICBX
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
ICB Network (ICBX) is a Layer-1 Proof-of-Stake blockchain designed for cross-chain applications and asset transfers, but presents severe weaknesses across core operational pillars. The project demonstrates almost negligible public development activity, with only 3 visible repository commits since early 2024. Tokenomics present heavy structural risk, with roughly 50% of the 100 billion token supply controlled by internal funds and team allocations without documented vesting schedules or unlock mechanisms. Market traction and trading volume remain minimal, and the team remains completely anonymous with unverified governance structures. On the security front, ICB Network completed one CertiK audit with another in remediation, and shows no history of exploits, hacks, or regulatory actions. Note that Community Support had insufficient data (-1.0) and was excluded from the weighted score calculation. Overall, the combination of stagnant development, anonymous leadership, and high supply overhang poses substantial downside risk.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About ICB Network (ICBX)
ICB Network (ICBX) is a Layer-1 Proof-of-Stake blockchain designed for cross-chain asset transfers and on-chain applications. ICBX functions as the network's native asset, intended for gas fee settlement, network staking, and governance participation. The token has a fixed total supply of 100 billion units, with approximately 19.3% reported in circulation.
From a security perspective, ICB Network completed an initial smart contract audit with CertiK in April 2024 covering its ICO and consensus components, alongside a second audit listed in the remediation stage. Documentation and security tracking indicate no historical smart contract exploits, hacks, or regulatory enforcement actions against the project.
However, the project presents several structural and operational risks. Public development activity is virtually absent, with only three commits recorded on its primary repository since February 2024. Furthermore, the project operates under entirely anonymous leadership without verifiable on-chain governance infrastructure or vote history. Token distribution exhibits a substantial supply overhang, with roughly 50% of the total supply allocated to team, advisor, reserve, and ecosystem development funds lacking transparent vesting schedules or unlock milestones.