Handy
HANDY
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation for HANDY is severely constrained by substantial data gaps across multiple dimensions. Active Development, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History all received scores of -1.0 due to severe search result name-collision contamination, leaving insufficient verifiable data on the token's development activity, roadmap, leadership, audits, or security track record. Among the evaluable sections, Community Support scored 1.5/10 due to dormant engagement, negligible trading volume ($0.00 24-hour DEX volume), and minimal on-chain activity despite a sizable holder count. Tokenomics scored 2.0/10, exhibiting severe centralization risks including 100% initial supply minting to a single deployer address, a contract trade-halt capability, and only ~2% circulating supply without documented vesting or emission schedules. Based on the proportional redistribution of weights across available sections, HANDY reflects an exceptionally weak profile.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Handy (HANDY)
HANDY is the utility token for HandyPick, a blockchain-based prediction and forecasting platform. Issued as a token across both the Ethereum and Klaytn networks, HANDY functions primarily as a reward mechanism distributed to users participating in prediction activities on the platform.
The token's design and market structure present notable centralization and liquidity constraints. The total maximum supply of 10 billion HANDY tokens was minted entirely to a single deployer address upon contract creation. Additionally, the smart contract contains an administrative trade-halt function. With only approximately 2% of the total supply in circulation and an absence of documented vesting or emission schedules, the token carries a significant potential dilution overhang.
On-chain metrics indicate limited activity and market engagement. While on-chain records show between 15,700 and 25,200 holder addresses, the network exhibits minimal transaction frequency and negligible decentralized exchange trading volume. Furthermore, verifiable public documentation regarding the project's active development, team governance structure, and formal security audits remains constrained.