The evaluation of GRIFT (ORBIT) reveals a stark dichotomy between its foundational backing and its operational reality. On one hand, the project scores highly in 'Team and Governance' (8/10) due to the credible background of SphereOne, its co-founders, and confirmed VC funding of $2.5 million. The 'Tokenomics' (5.8/10) also present a theoretical upside through revenue-based buybacks and a high circulating supply that minimizes inflation shocks. However, these positives are overwhelmingly negated by severe deficiencies in execution and transparency. The project fails critically in 'Active Development' (1.5/10) due to a complete absence of public code repositories, making the technology unverifiable. 'Community Support' (1.2/10) is virtually non-existent, with signs of a defunct ecosystem and abandonment. Furthermore, the 'Security' (3/10) score is marred by the lack of audits and data confusion with the hacked Orbit Chain. The branding choice of 'GRIFT' has proven disastrous, undermining trust ('Market and Use Case' 3.5/10). Ultimately, despite legitimate backing, the lack of development activity and community engagement renders this a highly dangerous investment.