GM.AI
GM
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall assessment for GM (GM.AI) reflects severe fundamental weaknesses and major information gaps across multiple dimensions. There were significant data gaps in three categories—Active Development, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History (all scored -1.0)—primarily caused by search results conflating the ticker with General Motors and generic AI topics rather than returning verifiable data for the Solana token contract. Evaluating the remaining sectors, Community Support scored poorly (2.0/10) due to minimal organic engagement and a total absence of decentralized governance structures. Tokenomics (2.5/10) reflects a ~98% drawdown from its all-time high, substantial uncirculated supply creating future dilution risks, and unverified utility mechanisms. Market and Use Case (1.0/10) highlights near-total market abandonment, characterized by a micro-cap valuation and essentially non-existent 24-hour trading volume ($1.16), with no documented product capture in the broader AI sector. With an adjusted weighted average score of 1.9/10, the project represents an extreme risk profile.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About GM.AI (GM)
GM.AI (GM) is a cryptocurrency token deployed on the Solana blockchain. Positioned within the decentralized artificial intelligence and trading sector, the project claims utility mechanisms such as token staking, revenue sharing, and token burn mechanisms. The token is structured with a total maximum supply of 1 billion GM tokens, of which approximately 350 million are in circulating supply.
The project displays notable gaps in operational documentation, team identity, and governance. There is no verifiable record of active development, commit logs, or formal external security audits for its smart contract. Furthermore, the ecosystem lacks decentralized governance infrastructure, with no active decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) framework, community voting systems, or verifiable community channels on platforms such as Discord or Telegram.
GM.AI has experienced a severe market decline, dropping roughly 97.7% to 98% from its all-time high of approximately $0.05004. Alongside the severe price drawdown, the token exhibits near-zero trading liquidity, recording 24-hour trading volumes near single-dollar figures, and presents ongoing dilution risks due to the significant portion of uncirculated supply.