Frontier
FRONT
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall assessment for FRONT (Frontier) is severely impacted by significant data gaps across four of the six evaluation categories: Active Development, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History (each scoring -1.0 due to search contamination with unrelated traditional finance, airline, and AI entities). Across the evaluable sections, the project displays substantial weaknesses. Community Support scored 2.0/10 due to a stagnant and slightly declining holder count (~6,635 holders), low market cap (~$1.3M), and lack of verifiable social and governance engagement in recent data. Tokenomics scored 4.0/10, benefiting from low future supply overhang (~97% circulating of the 90M max supply) but hindered by extreme liquidity concentration risk and no documented utility sinks. Excluded data gaps were redistributed proportionally between Community Support (15% base weight) and Tokenomics (20% base weight), yielding a mathematically derived overall score of 3.1.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Frontier (FRONT)
Frontier (FRONT) is a cryptocurrency token deployed across multiple blockchain networks, including Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon PoS, and Harmony. The token functions with a fixed maximum supply of 90,000,000 FRONT, of which approximately 87,456,250 tokens (around 97%) are in circulation.
The project exhibits significant limitations in activity, visibility, and on-chain engagement. Evaluated records indicate a stagnant holder base of approximately 6,635 to 6,656 addresses and a low market capitalization of approximately $1.3 million, presenting liquidity and concentration risks. Additionally, available data lacks verifiable documentation concerning token utility mechanisms, demand sinks, active development repositories, public governance operations, and independent smart contract audit reports.