Everyworld

EVERY (Everyworld) exhibits an extremely weak overall profile across the evaluated dimensions, alongside significant data gaps in Market/Use Case and Team/Governance where lack of verifiable project-specific documentation prevented scoring. Active development is virtually absent (score 1.0/10) with zero detectable GitHub commits, releases, or repository activity. Community engagement is negligible (score 1.0/10), characterized by a minimal holder base of ~1,019 and nonexistent governance or forum participation. Tokenomics (score 3.0/10) lacks essential disclosures regarding circulating supply, total supply caps, allocation breakdowns, and vesting schedules. Security and audit history (score 2.5/10) reveals that the contract has never received a third-party security audit, lacks KYC and bug bounty programs, and contains high-risk structural features such as a mintable token function and substantial holder concentration (38.84%).