Eclipse
ES
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The synthesis for ES (Eclipse) reveals severe data gaps across four key dimensions—Active Development, Community Support, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History (each scoring -1.0 due to search contamination with the unrelated open-source Eclipse Foundation). Excluding these data gaps and re-weighting the remaining sections yields a score based strictly on Tokenomics (3.5/10) and Market and Use Case (3.5/10). Eclipse is an SVM Layer-2 rollup on Ethereum with real token utility for gas and staking. However, the project is severely burdened by massive market cap contraction from its early private valuation, heavy unlock overhangs, insider concentration, and previous allocation model revisions. No affirmatively established qualifying red-flag events or confirmed fraud were found, but the combination of extreme data opacity and poor market fundamentals indicates severe risk.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Eclipse (ES)
Eclipse (ES) is a modular Ethereum Layer 2 rollup that executes transactions using the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM). The network is designed to combine Ethereum settlement and security with SVM execution architecture. The ES token exists across Ethereum, Eclipse, and Solana contract addresses and serves as the network's native utility asset for paying transaction gas fees, participating in governance, and facilitating sequencer staking.
The ES token has a fixed total supply of 1 billion units. Eclipse previously raised $50 million in private funding rounds at an initial valuation of $1 billion to support its development and infrastructure deployment. Within the network architecture, ES is integrated into the core economic model to incentivize sequencers and manage protocol updates.
Following its launch, the project has experienced substantial market and operational challenges. The token has suffered a severe market price collapse and market capitalization contraction compared to its early private valuation. Additionally, the project has contended with tokenomics concerns, including past token allocation controversies involving former leadership, subsequent post-launch revisions to its allocation model, heavy insider concentration, and an overhang of upcoming token unlocks.