Effect AI
EFFECT
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The evaluation for EFFECT (Effect AI) is significantly constrained by data gaps, with four out of six sections (Active Development, Community Support, Market and Use Case, and Security and Audit History) returning insufficient data (-1.0). For the evaluable sections, Team and Governance scored 5.0/10, noting backing by a legitimate Netherlands-based organization founded in 2017 with accelerator support, though individual leadership details and governance mechanics remain thinly documented. Tokenomics scored 3.5/10 due to opacity surrounding circulating supply, vesting, and utility following historical cross-chain migrations (NEO/EOS to Solana SPL). No qualifying red-flag events or confirmed fraud were established. The final score is based on the redistributed weighted average of Tokenomics (20%) and Team and Governance (15%).
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Effect AI (EFFECT)
Effect AI (EFFECT) is a token that underwent a historical blockchain migration from the NEO network to the Solana blockchain as an SPL token. Originating from a Netherlands-based organization founded in 2017 with backing from the YES!Delft startup accelerator, the project was established as a decentralized platform designed to coordinate human-driven microtasks and data services for artificial intelligence applications.
Initially described in a 2018 whitepaper as a NEP5 asset on NEO, the project transitioned its token infrastructure to Solana. The token is designed to support task settlement, token staking, and network operations within the Effect AI crowdsourcing framework, though technical specifics and active implementation details of its governance model remain thinly documented.
Evaluation of the protocol is subject to notable data limitations. Public records present insufficient data regarding recent software development activity, community governance participation, and independent smart contract audits. Furthermore, circulating supply metrics, token vesting schedules, and current holder distribution figures on Solana remain unverifiable in available market data.