DRAGONZ
DRAGONZ
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
DRAGONZ exhibits severe data limitations and fundamental weaknesses across multiple pillars. Three of the six evaluation categories—Community Support, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History—lacked project-specific information, scoring -1.0 due to data gaps. Among the evaluable sections, Active Development scored 3.5/10, showing product updates for an associated mobile game but negligible verifiable on-chain protocol development. Tokenomics scored 3.5/10, constrained by an implied ~80% non-circulating supply with no published vesting schedules or burn mechanics. Market and Use Case scored 1.0/10 due to extreme illiquidity, a micro-cap valuation under $80,000, and daily trading volumes under $100. No qualifying red-flag events were established, but the redistributed weighted average yields an overall score of 2.82.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About DRAGONZ (DRAGONZ)
DRAGONZ (DRAGONZ) is a cryptocurrency token deployed on the Venom blockchain. It serves as the native utility token for Dragonz Land, a play-to-earn trading card game launched in March 2025. The token is also linked to the mobile title Meta Toy DragonZ SAGA, which has maintained an active product update cadence across multiple game versions.
The core functionality of DRAGONZ includes facilitating in-game purchases, distributing tournament rewards, enabling tiered staking mechanisms, and supporting a governance model that remains under development. In terms of tokenomics, approximately 80% of the total token supply is non-circulating, with no publicly documented vesting schedules, supply caps, or token burn mechanisms recorded in available documentation.
The project faces significant liquidity and transparency risks. Market activity is marginal, characterized by a micro-cap valuation below $80,000 and 24-hour trading volumes under $100. Additionally, there is a lack of verifiable public data regarding the core development team, official governance structures, security audits, and on-chain protocol-level smart contract development.