Data Ownership Protocol 2

The provided evaluation context is incoherent, containing conflicting assessments for two distinct projects (DeepFakeAI and Zenko Protocol) rather than the requested SpaceChain (SPC). Based on the aggregated metrics from the text, the project exhibits critical weaknesses. Technical transparency is non-existent, characterized by an anonymous team, closed-source repositories, and a lack of verifiable engineering velocity (Scores 2/10 and 2.5/10). Security is a major concern due to the absence of independent audits and the presence of trust-based contract mechanisms. While the tokenomics section highlights a theoretical 'Real-Yield' model driven by ad revenue (Score 7.5/10), this does not compensate for the 'red flag' market signals, where high community counts fail to translate into organic trading volume. Due to the data inconsistency and severe lack of technical/security validation, the risk is extreme.