Decentrawood
DEOD
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
DEOD (Decentrawood) scores low across all core fundamental dimensions, yielding a weighted score of 2.9/10. Active development shows some product surfaces and DAO tooling, but is crippled by an absence of public code repositories and versioned changelogs. Community engagement is largely dormant with no active proposals or governance participation. Tokenomics are opaque, characterized by major supply discrepancies across aggregators, an undisclosed vesting structure for ~75% of the total supply, and concentrated privileged allocation functions in the contract. Market traction is low in an oversaturated metaverse/gaming sector, while the core team remains completely anonymous. Although a SolidProof audit exists, its validity is undermined by an explicit post-review contract hash modification warning. No qualifying catastrophic red-flag event or confirmed fraud was established, but extensive structural opacity, ongoing smart contract migration uncertainties, and lack of accountability indicate extreme risk.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Decentrawood (DEOD)
Decentrawood (DEOD) is a BEP-20 metaverse and Web3 gaming utility token on the BNB Chain that is undergoing a smart contract migration and tokenomics redesign. The project is designed to combine virtual world environments with artificial intelligence features (DEOD.Ai), non-fungible token (NFT) trading, and staking mechanisms. It also advertises a 50% ecosystem token burn mechanism and includes a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) framework intended for platform governance.
The DEOD token serves as the core medium of exchange and governance unit within the Decentrawood ecosystem. Although the project has deployed public interfaces and an online governance portal, community participation remains minimal, with no recorded proposal activity or measurable voting turnout in available records. Decentrawood operates in a competitive gaming and virtual world sector alongside established protocols, with limited documented user traction or on-chain adoption metrics.
Several structural and operational risks have been documented regarding Decentrawood's tokenomics and smart contract architecture. The core development team is anonymous, and development occurs without public source code repositories or versioned changelogs. While an audit was performed by SolidProof, the auditing firm issued an explicit disclaimer that contract code was modified after the security assessment, resulting in a hash mismatch with the audited version. The audit also identified privileged administrative functions allowing designated wallet roles to allot up to 10% of the total supply each. Furthermore, the token exhibits significant circulating supply discrepancies across major data aggregators, alongside undisclosed vesting schedules for approximately 75% of the total token supply.