CROSS

CROSS (CROSS) presents a polarized investment profile, characterized by strong technical security but weighed down by significant governance and sentiment risks. The project excels in Security and Audit History (9/10), featuring CertiK audits and a clean track record, and offers a solid Market and Use Case (7.2/10) as a gaming-optimized EVM Layer 1 with functioning infrastructure like a DEX and wallet. However, the evaluation is severely impacted by the Team and Governance (3.5/10) section, which highlights credibility concerns stemming from the founder's past regulatory controversies and allegations of market manipulation. Additionally, Community Support (4.5/10) is weak fundamentally; despite high follower numbers, sentiment is bearish and driven by paid incentives rather than organic adoption. Active Development (4.5/10) confirms a corporate, centralized approach with minimal open-source contributions. Finally, Tokenomics (6.2/10) reveals a major supply overhang with only ~34% of tokens circulating, creating long-term dilution risk. Overall, CROSS functions as a corporate product rather than a decentralized protocol, requiring investors to weigh working tech against substantial reputational and inflationary risks.