Crash On Base
CRASH
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall assessment of CRASH (Crash On Base) indicates extreme risk and very poor fundamentals across all verifiable dimensions. Significant data gaps exist, as Community Support, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History all received scores of -1.0 due to a lack of verifiable, token-specific data in retrieved sources. After redistributing weights equally between the two scorable sections (Active Development at 50% and Tokenomics at 50%), the weighted average yields an overall score of 1.5. Active Development scored 1/10, showing zero verifiable public repositories, releases, changelogs, or substantive development activity. Tokenomics scored 2/10, characterizing CRASH as a micro-cap memecoin on Base with around a $699K market cap, lacking an official website, vesting details, utility, or supply controls, while featuring smart contract centralization risks such as a mutable multiplier mechanism. No qualifying red-flag events or confirmed fraudulent mechanisms were affirmatively established, but the project exhibits severe structural and transparency deficits.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Crash On Base (CRASH)
CRASH (Crash On Base) is a micro-cap memecoin deployed on the Base blockchain network. The token operates with an estimated circulating supply of approximately 956.3 million tokens and functions without identified utility, structured vesting schedules, or transparent supply control mechanisms such as verified burn or inflation schedules. The project maintains no official website or verified public documentation.
Evaluation of the project highlights severe transparency and structural risks. An assessment of active development identified no verifiable public code repositories, changelogs, or technical releases associated with the token. Furthermore, the smart contract exhibits notable centralization and manipulation risks due to a mutable multiplier mechanism and a 'similar match' source-code status, alongside an absence of verified third-party security audits and anonymous governance.