COCA
COCA
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The overall assessment of COCA yields a score of 4.6/10, driven by significant data gaps and weak security diligence. Due to search contamination from The Coca-Cola Company, three sections lacked crypto-specific data and were excluded from scoring: Community Support (-1.0), Market and Use Case (-1.0), and Team and Governance (-1.0). For the evaluable sections, Active Development scored 5.5/10 based on self-reported roadmap progress (Q1-Q2 2026 self-banking milestones) without public code verification. Tokenomics scored 5.0/10 due to high insider concentration (>60%) and unverified utility demand despite long team lockups. Security and Audit History scored 3.0/10, as CertiK records confirm no third-party smart contract audits or external KYC verifications for this MPC self-banking wallet project, though no active exploits or legal actions were identified.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About COCA (COCA)
COCA (COCA) is a utility token associated with a non-custodial multi-party computation (MPC) wallet and self-banking fintech platform deployed on the Polygon blockchain. Distinct from The Coca-Cola Company beverage corporation, the project aims to integrate Web3 asset management with traditional financial rails, featuring services such as debit cards, IBAN accounts, SEPA transfers, and plans for eSIM connectivity and gas fee settlement.
The token has a maximum supply of 1.00 billion COCA. Official allocation distributions assign 27% of the supply to the treasury, 20% to the project team with a 48-month cliff, and 15% to partnerships. COCA is designed to serve as a utility asset within its payment infrastructure, including functionality positioned as a Universal Gas Token (UGT) across supported services.
The project carries notable operational and security risks. Tracking data from CertiK indicates that COCA has not undergone any third-party smart contract audits or independent team KYC verifications. Additionally, the project's technical development remains self-reported without publicly verifiable GitHub repositories, and tokenomics data reflects heavy insider allocation exceeding 60% alongside unverified utility demand.