Clover Finance
CLV
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
CLV (Clover Finance) demonstrates severe fundamental and structural decay across all evaluated dimensions. Technical development has ceased, with zero verifiable GitHub releases, mainnet upgrades, or active smart contract deployments. The community and governance structures are largely dormant, accompanied by an ongoing ~99.9% market drawdown from all-time highs and minimal trading liquidity. Tokenomics reveal an unfavorable setup with a massive historical supply overhang and no effective deflationary mechanisms or measurable utility demand. Furthermore, the project exhibits team abandonment and serial rebranding (into Lucent Network) with undisclosed current leadership and absent governance. While no confirmed hacks, rug pulls, or regulatory actions were verified against Clover Finance, the combination of technical stagnation, severe value destruction, and project rebranding warrants significant caution.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Clover Finance (CLV)
Clover Finance (CLV) is a cross-chain decentralized finance infrastructure token that has undergone serial rebranding into Lucent Network amid project abandonment and developmental stagnation. Originally created as an interoperability layer bridging Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and Substrate-based ecosystems, the protocol deployed token contracts across multiple networks, including Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain.
The CLV token features a fixed total supply of 1,000,000,000 units without native token burn mechanisms or deflationary supply controls. Its documented utilities were designed to support network transaction fees, validator staking, and decentralized governance participation across supported bridge environments.
The project faces significant operational and market risks, marked by a cessation of verifiable GitHub releases, mainnet upgrades, and active governance processes under undisclosed leadership. Financially, the token experienced an approximate 99.9% price collapse from its all-time high and trades roughly 99% below its initial CoinList sale prices of $0.20 to $0.35, resulting in substantial liquidity contraction and supply overhang. While no verified smart contract exploits, rug pulls, or regulatory enforcement actions were identified in protocol records, independent audit documentation remains unverifiable.